Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Others (Night Watch)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List_of_characters_in_the_Night_Watch_universe. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Others (Night Watch)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No sources (clarification 2012-02-07: no cited sources, not even primary) for years, apparently all plot and original research. I doubt there is sufficient (if any) WP:NOTABILITY for this to support an article. No merge target found. – sgeureka t•c 09:47, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Neutral - The "no sources" claim is a bit odd. The source for the contents of fictional works are...  the fictional works themselves.  That being said, I'm not sure that this subject rates its own article.  Possibly merge with List_of_characters_in_the_Night_Watch_universe? - Richfife (talk) 22:16, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 12:39, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B  music  ian  03:33, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 22:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisting comment: Still no clash, no sense of consensus. With only two participants, relisting seems preferable to a no consensus outcome at this moment (Not that I'd close no consensus again as a non-admin...;-). BusterD (talk) 22:44, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
 * A PROD would have ended with deletion by now for lack of opposition, so I think this should (at least) be treated the same way. – sgeureka t•c 08:37, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:RELIST seems to agree with you. In my own relisting, I tend to expect a minimum of 3 or 4 participants before closure. With your valid concern in mind, I'll express my own opinion on this procedure. BusterD (talk) 09:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as failing WP:GNG and WP:INUNIVERSE. No assertion of notablity, and a reasonable search of secondary sources finds nothing directly detailing the subject. BusterD (talk) 09:21, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge with List of World of Watches characters. A general article on the Night Watch mythology/universe might be useful, as the main article Night Watch (Lukyanenko novel) is very long.  But I don't think the Others themselves really need it/have enough references/are notable enough, and they could easily be merged. --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.