Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otiluke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – sgeureka t•c 21:45, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Otiluke

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

D&D character. No evidence of real-world notability, and no secondary sources cited. Tagged as needing better sourcing and some out-of-universe content since 2013. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Josh Milburn (talk) 19:09, 23 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to Greyhawk. BOZ (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Minor fictional character with very little in the way of reliable, secondary sources. There is one non-primary book being used in the article, but it is actually supporting very little information, and, regardless, is not enough to pass the WP:GNG alone.  Redirecting to Greyhawk, where he is briefly mentioned, may be OK, but a merge there does not really make a whole lot of sense due to the relative unimportance of the character and the lack of sourced information.  Rorshacma (talk) 21:38, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete sourcing clearly fails GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:26, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG, DnDcruft, belongs at https://greyhawk.fandom.com/wiki/Otiluke --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:36, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG Dartslilly (talk) 01:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.