Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otis Anderson Jr.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 08:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Otis Anderson Jr.

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable football player. His death is tragic but that doesn't make him notable. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, I'm finding some coverage not related to his death, e.g., , , , . BeanieFan11 (talk) 16:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:46, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I agree that his death doesn't make him notable. The news coverage of his life and death do, though. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep His death was tragic. But I feel there are enough sources for a GNG pass, including during his college career. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 00:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep While his death alone does not make him notable per WP:EVENT, There is enough non-routine coverage to justify inclusion. WP:NGRIDIRON allows for articles on players based on players having "notability arising from their college football days." these three sources, referring to Anderson as a "star" player and describing some of his accomplishments such as all-American Athletic Conference honors, combined with the unusual circumstances of his death, are enough to pass WP:GNG.  Frank   Anchor  15:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - Suffecient notability independent of his death. Deathlibrarian (talk) 08:46, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep sufficient coverage to pass GNG. L EPRICAVARK ( talk ) 17:20, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC, per the sources provided by BeanieFan11. Ejgreen77 (talk) 22:03, 2 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.