Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otis Yeager Chandler and Elizabeth Khuri-Yakub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 02:12, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Otis Yeager Chandler and Elizabeth Khuri-Yakub

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable married couple lacking independent in-depth, non-trivial support. Should be redirected to Goodreads, at minimum the article should be broken into two article, one for each individual in title. red dogsix (talk) 23:59, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - This couple is notable because they formed an important internet company. "He founded the company with the bride," The New York Times said. People don't get a mention like that in The Times unless they are worthy of notice, and in this case they are seen as a couple. So my opinion is Retain as-is. Sincerely, BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 04:34, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Wedding announcements are NOT independent resources. They are usually provided by the family or friends of the participants.  red dogsix (talk) 04:46, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete not a reasonable title for a redirect. The individual people may be notable, but none of the existing references demonstrate that.  The couple is not notable as a couple for founding a website, and their marriage announcement certainly doesn't make that notable. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 19:39, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: my first thought was "split", but looking at the sources it seems like neither have enough coverage to warrant an article, and notability is not inherited from Goodreads. We have a small amount of coverage of Chandler here and I could give the benefit of the doubt and say this is reliable, but that's unfortunately not enough. I oppose redirecting the page, as this is not a plausible search phrase. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 14:26, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bilorv/WP:INHERITED.  originalmess  how u doin that busta rhyme? 00:16, 5 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.