Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otis chodosh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was snowball del An insult to common sense of notability. `'mikka 00:35, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Otis chodosh

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is a sub-stub. I commented on the talk page that "As I understand it, any of a hojillion different mathematical statements could be considered 'corollaries to number theory.' This article seems to be making something insignficant sound as if it were important. 45 + 15 = 60 is a corollary to number theory. I invoke WP:BALLS." Considering the lack of content in the article's present statement, the fact that the subject is only 19 years old, and George's law, I doubt that any notable information can be found. I'm always willing to reconsider in the light of new evidence. Deranged bulbasaur 05:31, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Violation of WP:BIO. Not notable. -- KZ       Talk  •  Vandal  •  Contrib  05:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as the article in its current form does not satisfy the primary notability criterion or the criteria relating to people; furthermore, the information that is within the article is not attributed to a reliable source. Kyra~(talk) 05:59, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO. And all the IPs that contributed are from Stanford, including one poor user who kept trying to blank the page... -SpuriousQ (talk) 10:07, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.