Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otra Tocada Mas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to El Tri (band) as a viable ATD Star   Mississippi  23:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Otra Tocada Mas

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article has no sources CocaPopsRather  ( talk ) 22:28, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * This fails No reliable sources, no verifiability, no article CocaPopsRather  ( talk ) 22:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Mexico.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - Per WP:NEXIST the absence of sources in an article is not an indicator of notability, and per WP:BEFORE a nominator should attempt to find some before nomination for deletion. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 14:58, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:16, 14 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  09:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep It's part of the discography of a very notable band, isn't that enough? And if in fact isn't, couldn't be merge with other minor albums? Zidane tribal (talk) 17:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Notability of the performer(s) has nothing to do with that of their recordings. This is not a vote.  dxneo  (talk) 08:42, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:NALBUM and WP:SIGCOV. Alternatively redirect to El Tri (band) per WP:ATD. A WP:BEFORE search yielded no significant coverage. Rather than trouncing the nominator, commenters should do a good faith search for sources before chastising someone for not doing due diligence. I could locate no reviews in RS and there weren't even passing mentions of the album. Nothing in google books, newspapers.com, entertainment magazines like Billboard or Variety, or even in standard e-zines or music websites where one would usually find a review. It appears to be an entirely non-notable work by a notable band.4meter4 (talk) 15:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.