Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OttoQL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

OttoQL

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NOTMANUAL. This doesn't read like an encyclopedia page, it reads like a manual or textbook. Searches didn't turn up anything to suggest the topic is notable either. FuriouslySerene (talk) 18:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete A search reveals no books discussing this and only 15 hits in GScholar. Most were papers by the creator. The non creator papers only had passing mentions. Without multiple, independent, in-depth, reliable sources, this article cannot stand. --Mark viking (talk) 04:36, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * delete Student project? No significance technically, no independent notability paid to it. Viam Ferream (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.