Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Mann


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No prejudice against continuing a merge discussion. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Otto Mann

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references and no real-world information. The Almightey Drill (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 February 22.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 00:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per 1 and 2 and other such references. There's enough real-world, non-Simpsons analysis of the character to warrant an article. I don't necessarily like it but trying to delete even "second tier" characters from franchises like The Simpsons will often be a fruitless endeavour. Stalwart 111  10:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. He's more notable than anyone who will ever comment in this AFD. :) -- do  ncr  am  01:24, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge to List of recurring The Simpsons characters. Otto is no more notable than Agnes Skinner, Kirk Van Houten, Helen Lovejoy, or a host of other characters who have already been redirected to that article.--NukeofEarl (talk) 18:09, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge, as per NukeofEarl. Not significant enough to merit own page, much better served on the larger Simpsons character page. mikeman67 (talk) 01:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.