Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otto Z Stern


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to The Register. Note that addition to the register is entirely original writing and does not demand a redirect, however, a mention of it in that article does make a good case for the redirect. -Splash talk 23:23, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

Otto Z Stern
Page contains nothing but non-encyclopedic and/or false information. Otto Z Stern is a columnist for The Register and is borderline notable, if that Aim Here 01:52, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is not a real biography. "Otto Z Stern is just a great example of British sense of humour. It always surprises me when people respond angrily as though he's real and to be taken seriously." from reader feedback at Nick Lewis: The Blog. The Register has a tradition of satirical articles, which many people take seriously. Otto is nothing but a fake satirical character, and of course, there is no mention of this on the wikipedia article *yet* which makes it factually lacking. --Phanton 09:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: added a disputed tag to the article. --Phanton 09:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable biography. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-04 03:06Z 
 * Delete as . Scoo 08:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * WTF??? Even after reading this I still don't know who this guy is supposed to be! Delete. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] AfD? 12:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Register: Stern is a fictional character used to byline parody pieces. -- Karada 14:01, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I have attempted to merge this into The Register as a new paragraph. Feel free to change/edit/rework as much as required. --Phanton 04:45, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.