Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otupa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 23:13Z 

Otupa

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:V and WP:COI - two of the sources are generic, and the other links to the the creator's webpage, which doesn't even discuss the company. Google search reveals only clones. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 02:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Also see Articles for deletion/Otupa Flow
 * Delete per nom Josh Parris 04:01, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no assertion of notability. — coe l acan t a lk  — 05:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. vanity page. John Vandenberg 06:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete vanity. Pavel Vozenilek 17:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. --MaNeMeBasat 14:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete just looks like a vanity page. needs mores sourcesSlideAndSlip 21:31, 13 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.