Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otupa Flow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-13 23:02Z 

Otupa Flow

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable crystal ball article, "a state-of-the-art watercraft currently being built for James Martin, which will go on a mission of discovery and exploration." Sounds neat, but it's not for Wikipedia. See also Articles for deletion/Otupa. — coe l acan t a lk  — 05:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, by the way. — coe l acan t a lk  — 05:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lots of optimistic statements and impressive statistics with absolutely no sourcing - the "website" in the infobox is a 404.  Fails WP:V, plain and simple. - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 05:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. vanity page. John Vandenberg 06:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:CRYSTAL Whilding87  14:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Pavel Vozenilek 17:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —dima/s-ko/ 04:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. --MaNeMeBasat 14:55, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.