Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Lady of the Earth and Sky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo (talk) 06:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Our Lady of the Earth and Sky

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable organization, cited sources are either not reliable or provide only trivial or incidental coverage of the subject. GlassFET 18:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Yes, its a church, and don't know how many people attend the sermon, or equiv. Sources and notability are slim, but if its used by hundreds of folk a week, it should be kept. scope_creep (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Where is the source for "used by hundreds of folks a week"? -  Kathryn NicDhàna  ♫ ♦ ♫ 20:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete This was speedied as nn, and the recreated version is not much better. Most of the "sources" added didn't even mention the group. We've been waiting on explanation of how these sources support notability - since June - and no explanation, assertion of notability, or expansion has been forthcoming. The sources note that the group exists, but not why we should have an article on it. -  Kathryn NicDhàna  ♫ ♦ ♫ 20:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable. 132.205.99.122 (talk) 20:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete no claim of notability and no reliable sources with more than incidental coverage. Karanacs (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This "church" is not notable and has never done anything notable and nobody who belongs to it has ever done anything notable. Qworty (talk) 21:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * delete as non notable. Making claims like "nobody who belongs to it has ever done anything notable" is a bit uncivil, and since you have no real way of knowing who belongs to the church, notable or not, it will only blow hot air on cinders, which will of course make flames. Simply unnecessary commentary, IMO.  Cheers,  Keeper  |  76  22:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Abstain - breaking my promise to vote "keep" if this ever came up for AfD. &mdash;Ashley Y 02:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * delete as non-notable. It's not a statement about the significance of the group itself since it clearly is significant to those who are members of the church, it's about whether or not Wikipedia should have an article on it.  I have yet to see why they need a Wiki article.  Scarletwoman93 (talk) 02:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.