Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out-of-Sync


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Given the nominator's withdrawal and the only "vote" being to Keep the article. Liz Read! Talk! 05:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Out-of-Sync

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I found no reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and nothing on Newspapers.com. I did a WP:BEFORE and found only one review from TV Guide. Needs two or more reviews to be eligible per NFO, NFSOURCES and WP:NEXIST. The Film Creator (talk) 11:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 11:12, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep another review at Radio Times  Donald D23   talk to me  12:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I withdraw per Donaldd23’s contribution.  My humble apologies. The Film Creator (talk) 14:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @The Film Creator, no apology necessary! AfD's all about finding the right outcome, not keeping score. I'm glad people like yourself and @Donaldd23are looking at these under-referenced articles to fix or delete them.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 17:55, 11 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.