Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out West/Rubber Nipple Salesmen

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was No consensus, so keep --Allen3 talk July 4, 2005 17:19 (UTC)

Out West/Rubber Nipple Salesmen
Unsourced POV. --W(t) 06:44, 2005 Jun 19 (UTC)
 * Delete POV, Badly written, unsourced, episode of notable series that is not notable by itself. &mdash;Kjammer 07:03, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV, lack of context. However, very funny. -- Spotteddogsdotorg 08:33, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup and keep if we're doing episode guides (eg South Park) then that's not grounds for deletion. likewise, being poorly written or POV is also not grounds for deletion, it's grounds for sticking a cleanup request or npov disclaimer on the article. Nateji77 09:26, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup and keep as above. Precedent, plus Ren and Stimpy is one of those series with notable individual episodes (Kilted Yaksmen, Powdered Toast Man, etc.). 23skidoo 13:43, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Kjammer. &mdash; mark &#9998; 15:51, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Clean up and keep as per Nateji77. Celestianpower 15:53, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Wikipedia is not paper. Kappa 21:25, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as long as there is not more content. Martg76 21:29, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV non notable one episode joke. JamesBurns 06:33, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * POV and joke ought to be mutually exclusive. Nateji77 12:34, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well, I can't make anyone, but I plan on probably writing more myself, so if people could use that same format, and re-write this one completly, i think the result would be much better. Also, there's also a review for Black Hole/Stimpy's Invention that similarly bad, and i'm hoping that either someone else or myself can re-write it with a similar format to the other ones i've done as well. I've tried to be as extensive as possible with info on every episode i've done reviews for, and may probably write more, this way. Also, I've written these myself, and my info comes from several things, such as magazine articles (like WIld Cartoon Kingdom) and whenever possible from DVD commentary and from John K quotes himself. ALso, when there is something that is speculation or something notable that is popular speculation, I list it as such. I don't have an account with Wikipedia such as of yet, but I come from the Members Of The Loyal Order Of Stuppids, Message Board and my name there is The New X. (2 time member of the month and member of the year nominee, currently.)
 * Delete. Not notable. Jayjg (talk)  21:08, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite I've already written a review for Stimpy's Big Day/The Big Shot myself. It's a formula for episode reviews that I also continued in my review for Robin Hoek/Nurse Stimpy. I plan on possibly re-writing this eventually with that format, as I feel this is currently an unimformative and extremly basic review. I'd appreciate it if the entries tried to adheare to that format i've written in the other entries as well, too.
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.