Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out in Fifty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  03:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Out in Fifty

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NFSOURCES. Found nothing in a WP:BEFORE search. No reviews on Rotten Tomatoes. The Film Creator (talk) 19:10, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:07, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: For analysis of the sources listed above.
 * Comment IMDb lists 3 reviews . I'm unsure about the quality of those sources – the last two look like they might just be blogs, although the first one seems like it might be reasonably reliable (at first glance, at least). TompaDompa (talk) 23:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't think those can pass as reliable sources WP:NFP or as "full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics" per WP:NFO. Kolma8 (talk) 23:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: It made it into DVD & Video guide for a few years after the release and into the 2000's International dictionary of films and filmmakers, but I could not find anything else. Kolma8 (talk) 23:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails NFILM. LunaEatsTuna (talk) 04:15, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. It actually seems to be notable in Germany, where it was called Eine Nacht in L.A. (One Night in LA). I am then counting the Actionfreunde.de review together with this long review and this short review. On the not-so-significant side there is also a blurby German text and a TV Guide blurb. That being said, Whydoesitexist seems like a quality review, albeit it may be written by a relatively unknown person, and there is also a podcast about the film, maybe made by a relatively unknown person too. Geschichte (talk) 05:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep any time you have that kind of star power in a production it is notable. Notable for being bad. WP:NFILM. This is a film with major actors. One can find some minor coverage. This looks like a blog. Looks like TCM showed it in 2004. Mentioned in NY Mag. It gets panned in the Sydney Morning Herald. I think we have enough to keep this article. Will need to reference the article, but that is surmountable. Lightburst (talk) 01:55, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per 'Lightburst' and 'Geschichte' Donald D23   talk to me  12:54, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as reliable sources significant coverage has been identified in this discussion such as The Sydney Morning Herald,and multiple German sources so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.