Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out of Space (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete both. --Core desat 02:40, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Out of Space (film)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable film without an IMDB entry. Possible COI, see WP:COIN. MER-C 13:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Adding Labyrinth Arts (producers of this film) to this AFD. NawlinWiki 22:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable.  The so-called "acclaimed horror film director"'s wikilink leads to a Costa Rican porn actor, which I'm not sure was mistaken or not.  Either way, several Google searches come up with nothing substantial.  I cannot comment on the COI interest, having not read into it, but I wouldn't be surprised.  María ( habla  con migo ) 13:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. For the reasons given above plus the fact that the external link provided is solely to lead a user to the filmmaker. A second look at the page in question leads me to think that the page for Labyrinth Arts may need looking into also. MarnetteD | Talk 14:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * 'Keep as notable, but I'll add a "future" tag. Bearian 17:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, article doesn't assert film's notability. Bearian, in what way is this film notable? NawlinWiki 21:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- Non-notable future release. It would require press-coverage at minimum to qualify for a future event type article. Likely COI since the creator also uploaded Image:Outofspacethemovie.jpg as gfdl-self. Labyrinth Arts should probably roll into this, or db-club. -wizzard2k  ( C &#x2022;  T  &#x2022;  D ) 22:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Added, see above. NawlinWiki 22:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Where does this future release tag come from? This class/group project is so non-notable that there is no evidence whether it has been released or not. It should not be listed as a future release when it may have already been shown in Stoke-on-Trent. MarnetteD | Talk 01:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NOT for self-promotion & advertising. — Athaenara ✉ 13:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 21:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.