Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Out on a Limb Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As illustrated, there are multiple sources covering the topic. And, in absence of convincing arguments for deletion, closing this as keep. (non-admin closure)  Ya  sh  !   19:51, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Out on a Limb Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable record label. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 00:33, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as searches have found nothing better at all and that's not surprising considering this is only a local indie label, nothing at all satisfying any applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  22:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Your searches rarely seem to find "anything better", do they? --Michig (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:25, 8 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Longstanding record label, with a decent amount of coverage from multiple sources:, , , , , , , , , . No evidence that anyone else here has performed a competent web search before offering an opinion. --Michig (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep plenty of Google hits relating to the record label, and also per the hits supplied by . you may wish to change your !vote. -- st170e talk  16:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.