Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outback Zack's Australian Animal fire Victims Appeal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:35, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Outback Zack's Australian Animal fire Victims Appeal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A 2008, one-hour Australian television special to raise funds for Wildlife Victoria. Only cited reference is IMDB. I'm not familiar with nobility guidelines for television specials, but I was unable to find sources for this to meed general nobility guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Bgwhite (talk) 17:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  —Bgwhite (talk) 17:56, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

The issue is that IMDB data is sourced from the production companies, so accuracy is questionable. Third party references would help, however I was unable to find any before my family vacation intervened. It might be best if you extend things for one week due to time constraints both at my end and at Zack Heart's end. I have not been speaking to him or his team directly, however I've heard indications via the Jungle Telegraph that there may be internal problems of some sort on his side. This may or may not be accurate, it's just rumor as far as I'm concerned so far, however I'd rather error on the side of caution. Once I'm back from vacation however, I will go so far as to make a phone call directly to him. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 02:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete no longstanding notability as per WP:EVENT and WP:EFFECT. LibStar (talk) 01:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails to cross either the verifiability or notability thresholds due to lack of references from reliable third-party sources. - Dravecky (talk) 20:25, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.