Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outlook Training Organisation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:13, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Outlook Training Organisation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Article contains no references to independent secondary sources. Google search returns only one hit to their own website. TYelliot &#124;  Talk  &#124;  Contribs  16:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:10, 16 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Lack of significant coverage in third-party reliable sources; fails to meet corporate notability. PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: source searches show little in the way of sustained, in-depth coverage to warrant passing WP:NCORP. StraussInTheHouse (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - dearth of significant coverage, fails WP:CORPDEPTH by a country mile. ƒirefly  ( t · c · who? ) 21:11, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.