Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outlook club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The additional sources have been reviewed by the commentators but the consensus remains that they are insufficient to establish notability. I notice that the essential content has also been added to The Rolling Stones, by the same user. It is for the editors of that article to determine whether the sources have sufficient reliability. Meanwhile, I see no reason not to have a redirect which I have created but with correct capitals (Outlook Club is a proper name). TerriersFan (talk) 23:21, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Outlook club

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced article on a music venue. Author asserts notability as the site of the Rolling Stones' first gig outside of Greater London. I prodded this earlier--author didn't remove the prod tag but protested on the talk page, so I took it here to AfD. -- Finngall  talk  21:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete non-notable venue. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 16:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - as a non-notable venue. However, notability could quickly be established with a reliable source or two. Tnxman307 (talk) 14:53, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * delete non-notable club/business. Peter Fleet (talk) 18:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Author has added references. Everyone who has weighed in so far, please go back and look again.  Thanks. -- Finngall   talk  13:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note to admins The article has been improved since the above delete !votes were added. As the article currently stands, I'm inclined to withdraw the nom, but am hesitant to do so without seeing a couple of second opinions.  Barring last-minute input one way or the other, I think relisting would be in order in this case. -- Finngall   talk  15:27, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted bearing in mind the late sources which were added in order that a true consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 20:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - I said delete above, but have noticed that this article has been relisted and sources have been added. I looked into the sources as best I could. Two of the links listed are photographs of the club with no claims of notability. I could not find any information on the Gazette article except for a poster on the paper's comments board who said the paper carried a "small notice on page 10 saying the Rolling Stones and the Hollies would be playing the next night". Unfortuntely, none of this really seems to hold up. I stand by my opinion listed above. TN ‑ X - Man  21:47, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: I've contacted the other two users to ask them to revisit, which I probably should have done when relisting. Stifle (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per TNXMan. Unable to verify the sources cited other than what he said. Stifle (talk) 08:33, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I said delete originally. I have reviewed the changes and my opinion hasn't changed. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 09:59, 12 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.