Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside air conditioning unit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to Air conditioning. The socks have been blocked -User:Mys e kurity|Mysekurity ]] additions | e-mail]]12:14, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Outside air conditioning unit
Someone deleted this article without explanation as to why. Perhaps it should be deleted or merged somewhere. Should it? CarDepot 21:09, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge them both into air conditioning until there is so much information that they need to be split out. No need to delete. Trollderella 21:28, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The difference between the outside and the inside AC units needs explanation, because they are very different things, not only a different location. Otherwise, I wouldn't need to have both at my house. CarDepot 03:00, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I'd say. Houses usually have both one of these and an inside air conditioning unit. Science3456 22:41, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into air conditioning, of course - it's the same thing regardless of where it's installed - the differences are trivial. CDC   (talk)  00:53, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * If an outside air conditioning unit and an inside air conditioning unit are the same thing and the differences between them are so trivial, then why are there both of those kinds of units at my house and not only an outside AC unit or only an inside AC unit? Obviously there's quite a big difference between them if both of them are needed at my house and most other houses that I've visited. If the differences were trivial, then there wouldn't need to be both at my house controlling my air conditioning system. Also, an air conditioning unit is a part of the air conditioning system, not the whole air conditioning system, so should not be redirected to air conditioning, but kept Science3456 02:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment It was never deleted, and should never have been brought here. Editing disputes, such as whether material like this belongs in a separate article or part of a larger one, should be discussed on the Talk pages of the relevant articles. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:53, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * NOTE This article was nominated for AfD by the same author who created it. This author appears to be a sockpuppet for StuRat. The intent of this nomination appears to be to disrupt AfD. Denni &#9775; 06:06, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect to air conditioning. Vegaswikian 07:17, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Add Image. Garr 00:05, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep 64.194.44.220 15:01, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and Expand Foosher 03:29, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep TreeFrogz 11:03, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment This user's only votes are for AfDed articles created by the author of this article. Denni &#9775; 03:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.