Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outside of the Love


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 13:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Outside of the Love

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nominated for speedy deletion, but it does not match any of those criteria, so I'm going to put this here. The reason for speedy deletion was: Rumor, no source given--no album title has been confirmed. We should also note that there are no assertions of notability for this album, or any references. ——  Eagle 101 Need help? 00:23, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I tried to find things for this album. I found nothing at all to confirm even the production. It is crystal-ballism at present. Acalamari 02:04, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You can definitely confirm the production (just look at the sources provided in the third album section on Ashlee Simpson). Everyking 03:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You're right. :) How did I miss that? At any rate, nothing is confirmed though. Acalamari 16:40, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The title is completely unconfirmed and probably some fan just made it up. I tagged it for speedy deletion and feel that it would have been better to kill it immediately due to the probability that it is a hoax (if it is true, it's based only on inside info and not published sources). I am in favor of going ahead and creating an article for the album, even though it's still untitled, but there's no sense in working off of this mess (Ashlee has never described the album the way this article claims she has--quite the opposite, actually--and the date of release is also fake). Everyking 03:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Keb25 05:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. Very minimal hits while attempting to google this. At worst it's a hoax, at best it's a guess. --Bongwarrior 05:56, 13 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.