Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outsourcing typing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 21:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Outsourcing typing
Reads like a (blatant?) advertisement for "OutSec" (www.outsec.co.uk). Article's creator and only editor was User:Richard Phillips, who signs his name at the bottom and gives his title as (surprise!) Operations Director, OutSec Limited. The article concept on its own does not seem like it could be expanded/changed to have its own (non-advert) article, thus, delete.-- P e ruvianLlama(spit) 07:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete, almost looks computer-generated. Gazpacho 08:11, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as blatant spam/advertising. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 09:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable corporation. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-25 10:00Z 
 * Delete vanispamcruftisement for a non-notable company. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] AfD? 17:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This belongs on a corporate website rather than an encyclopædia.  (aeropagitica)   17:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 20:16, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Latinus 20:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Latinus 20:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.