Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outwood Academy Riverside


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:04, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Outwood Academy Riverside

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article about a local secondary school which fails to assert notability. Links are to government lists of schools and routine local press coverage that confirms that the school exists, but there is nothing to show any particular notability. There are a number of other articles for these "Outwood" schools that are similar. Flip Format (talk) 11:28, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools, United Kingdom,  and England. Flip Format (talk) 11:28, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  01:22, 13 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:34, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Lean keep Added a couple references that were less routine and more substantial. Flurrious (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Checked the refs found by Flurrious (thanks for finding these) and still don't see coverage that is not run of the mill. They are also both Teesside Live refs, and we already had two of those in the article, so this doesn't add a further independent source. As the school has only been in operation three years, I think it is too soon for it to meet WP:GNG. Redirect to Outwood Grange Academies Trust would also be an option (I don't think there is enough content to make a merge worthwhile). Tacyarg (talk) 21:34, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.