Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ova Prima


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was del. mikka (t) 21:14, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Ova Prima

 * del Nonnotable joke. Despite being named "web hoax" is sits in the web largely unnoticed for quite some time, with about 150 unique google hits. mikka (t) 01:13, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment the edit history for this article goes back for 4 years, but it appears to lack much notability today so I would concur with a vote to delete.--MONGO 01:37, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete for an nn joke (It's listed at, and its mission statement is "to provide funding for research efforts that build a body of scientific evidence showing the egg came first.") &mdash;Bmdavll talk 03:59, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Let's be serious now...this doesn't sound like its trying to be a serious article. Delete, please.-MegamanZero 17:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: It was a weekly ha-ha mass forwarded through e-mail. Well, the thing about the weekly ha-ha is that it's gone by the time it's noticed.  I'm sure people said/thought, at the time, "Well, if no one remembers it in a year, we can remove it."  It has been four years.  No one remembers it.  (And, incidentally, there was a "ova prima" theory for a while that said that humans come from a woman's egg alone, that the sperm is merely a sort of activator to the egg, and that the person is fully formed inside the egg, needing only the food or spark of the sperm to grow.  Inside the female persons inside the eggs are eggs that contain within them fully formed people, and some are female, who have within them eggs with....  The idea was that Eve had the entire run of humanity in her, and that is how original sin could be passed on.  It was a minority theory, but Laurence Sterne satirized it in Tristram Shandy.)  Geogre 17:49, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. (Bjorn Tipling 20:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC))
 * Delete as non-notable. Turnstep 16:07, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per mikka. Stifle 22:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable Sethie 18:48, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.