Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ovation Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 01:05, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Ovation Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Company fails WP:CORPDEPTH (insufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources). &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 23:46, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 09:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 09:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 09:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:26, 5 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't even find much trivial coverage in reliable sources. --I am One of Many (talk) 05:18, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly promotional - could have been speedied. Deb (talk) 12:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but a speedy was declined in 2007, so I just assumed bring it here. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 15:37, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.