Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oveco (Bishop of Oviedo)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. I doubt that the sources for this are in my library, either. But the article seems to be more than adequately sourced, especially for an article on a tenth century cleric; the subject seems obviously notable, no case for deletion is made in the nomination, and no one other than the nominator has asked for deletion. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Oveco (Bishop of Oviedo)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * sources are scattered from a book which I could not find in my local library.keystoneridin! (talk) 04:43, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep This is not a valid reason for deletion. In my local library, I cannot find this book, either. --Pgallert (talk) 08:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  --  The  left orium  10:37, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep I could not find this book under my bed. --Cameron Scott (talk) 11:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep - I couldn't find it either. Course I don't read Spanish, or for that matter spell very well, so I really can't tell if it might be there or not. John Carter (talk) 14:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per above. Tom Harrison Talk 14:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I would say keep; It is someone from the Dark Ages, so the sources are bound to be thin, but the article makes clear what is known of him; OTOH he was, apparently, a notable figure of his time and place. And the original editor has established a contribution history for this period. Swanny18 (talk) 15:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.