Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over The Top (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Over The Top (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organization lacking non-trivial references. red dogsix (talk) 01:20, 11 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as a run-of-the-mill company that does not meet WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. There is a huge number of references in the article, none of which does more than mention Over The Top in passing (in some cases there's not even a mention of the company's name). Several of the refs are different copies of the same text, which is not surprising if you look at the authors - a few people have written texts where they briefly quote the company's founder and have then sold the same text to different publishers. I'm sure it is good SEM tactics or whatever, but it doesn't make the company (nor its founder) notable for Wikipedia's purposes. --bonadea contributions talk 09:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG as I am able to find passing mention of the firm but unable to find substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:40, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

stay- over the top is a recognized company that has been listed on Forbes and spoken about on business.com and other recognised sources. the content might not be detailed enough, but it still deserves a chance on Wikipedia. I believe with time other sources can be added. it deserves a chance on Wikipedia.197.210.25.185 (talk) 19:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - Recognized by whom? Being recognized is not part of the criteria for inclusion into Wikipedia. Please see WP:ORG for the criteria.   red dogsix (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete unambiguous promotion DarjeelingTea (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
 * stay - there is nothing promotional about the content, some links have been added and their sources have been retrived. Jamesflare (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.