Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Over the Limit (2012)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep, bad faith nomination. --MuZemike 18:41, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Over the Limit (2012)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

This article is not notable enough for wikipedia. Glock17gen4 (talk) 02:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

I disagree entirely, it's common practice for WWE Pay-Per-Views to have a wikipedia page instated months in advance, and seeing as this is the next PPV scheduled to take place, this article is more notable than most. Keep 144.32.128.14 (talk) 03:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Keep. All WWE PPVs have articles on Wikipedia, why should this one be any diiferent? Vjmlhds 04:03, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Keep PPV are the center of the Wrestlingbusiness there happens the title changes and there are the points where the storyline leads in. --Nakurio (talk) 04:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC) Keep. Every WWE pay-per-view is notable. InFlamester20 (talk) 05:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Bad faith pointy nom. Stems from some MMA articles nominator's been involved in being merged or deleted from what I've read. Just another one of many that's been nommed to disrupt AfD today. Papacha (talk) 05:43, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Keep. I know you like MMA, but don't act in bad faith with the Pro-Wrestling PPV events page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emigdioofmiami (talk • contribs) 12:49, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Keep. Though I could agree that Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, but it will be not too nice to recreate the article after the PPV. Kyrios320 (talk) 12:57, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Keep I have no idea why this would be deleted... It's an event, like every WWE event (and to a lesser extent TNA events), it has its own article. Most times they provide a background, description of the story taking place during the PPV and the aftermath. Gorgak25 (talk) 13:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy keep. Perfectly notable PPV, no reason not to have it. The nominator did not provide any reasons as to why it's not notable. –  Richard  BB  13:32, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.