Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overcompensating


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:39, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Overcompensating

 * — (View AfD)

Comic's notability is insufficient to warrant its own article per WP:WEB. I would suggest merging and redirecting to the author's page, but said page already contains more information on the comic than the comic's article does. I'm leaning towards deleting, as redirecting from a common word seems out of place. Brad Beattie (talk) 23:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per failure of WP:V. I see no reliable secondary sources cited in the article. (I'm willing to revisit my opinion here if WP:V is met) ---J.S  (T/C) 00:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per JS FirefoxMan 22:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.