Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overseas Christian Fellowship Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:50, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Overseas Christian Fellowship Australia

 * – ( View AfD View log )

blatantly fails WP:ORG. despite existing for over 60 years, nothing in gnews. 6 hits in gbooks with 4 of the books being LLC Books which use WP as a source. LibStar (talk) 05:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment - the article Overseas Christian Fellowship is about the same organisation. StAnselm (talk) 07:35, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm nominating that too for deletion. lacks sources . LibStar (talk) 07:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge. This seems to be an (improperly constructed) AfD for two articles. They should obviously be merged, but the organisation (under the correct title) gets quite a few gbooks hits, and is clearly notable. -- 202.124.73.248 (talk) 10:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC) — 202.124.73.248 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, and delete its companion article as well. This is not a notable organization. A search of Google News Archive finds nothing significant. A search of Google Books finds one passing mention, otherwise only directories. --MelanieN (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I don't know the niceties of AfD nominations, but I think it may be necessary to set up a separate AfD discussion for the companion article since it was nominated a day later than this one. --MelanieN (talk) 21:44, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable organisation. Keb25 (talk) 10:52, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.