Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overseas Indian Cultural Congress


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) buidhe 04:38, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Overseas Indian Cultural Congress
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NORG and WP:GNG. Hemant DabralTalk  15:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 February 27.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 16:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:ORGCRIT. I performed a [Google News Search] and could find nothing more than passing mentions. --BonkHindrance (talk) 16:16, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The article did not pass our notability criteria.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 04:11, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Organisation in existence for 30+ years, mostly active in the Gulf; multiple sources across multiple years. Easily passes ORG. AfD is not cleanup.

--Goldsztajn (talk) 10:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Per references and reasoning found by Goldsztajn. The article was poorly sourced but I note the WP:BEFORE did not evidence efforts to consider alternatives to AfD first such as notability tagging and possible merges (Djm-leighpark).Djm-mobile (talk) 23:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Leaning towards keep based on the findings by . KartikeyaS (talk) 17:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 05:32, 6 March 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b<b style="color: White">uidh</b><b style="color: White">e</b> 19:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.