Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overview of 21st century propaganda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Wrong venue. Please see WP:MERGE for guidance on how to propose mergers. AfD is not the right place. Michig (talk) 08:21, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Overview of 21st century propaganda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another case where might have gone too far and certainly too fast in splitting articles. This is now a split of History of Propaganda which in turn was split from Propaganda, and all within half an hour and without any prior discussion. Now I'm not certain that this mere collection of examples warrants an article on its own. For now, it should rather be merged back to History of propaganda or even to where it came from, to Propaganda. PanchoS (talk) 00:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * This article helps to organise Wikipedia's coverage of the topic much better than the original, overloaded article on Propaganda did. It's important to consider the readers' comfort in navigating articles. KEEP this article. Hendrick 99 (talk) 03:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge (w/ caveat) Merge, but several of the claims in this article are missing sources, and WP:RS should be found or the claims deleted. &#8213;  Padenton  &#124;&#9742; 04:11, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment, parent article is close to suggested size stated at WP:SIZERULE, therefore, this can be seen as a legitimate sub-article.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, the same content is already in other article. This seems to be an undiscussed page split. Red Harvest (talk) 20:42, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.