Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Overwhelming Evidence


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-07 06:10Z 

Overwhelming Evidence

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Site fails WP:WEB no reliable sources other than blogs and itself also has very little user traffic and usage. Most of the discussion of it on other sites makes fun of its lack of users and contents. Tmtoulouse 05:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Intinn Talk! 09:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. -Yupik 11:23, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. Mkdw talk 00:01, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom --J2thawiki 19:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as above. The article looks like an attempt to drive Wikipedia traffic to the website. SheffieldSteel 20:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Sean MD80 talk 00:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, as the nominator themselves says there is coverage of this site elsewhere. And just because it has been negative coverage is not a reason for deletion. What next will this train of thought lead to, deletion of Mike Tyson because of the hugely massive amount of negative coverage he has had? Mathmo Talk 04:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: There maybe coverage of the site, but none of it is WP:RS there are no reliable citeable sources outside a few blogs here and there and itself. Tmtoulouse 06:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.