Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owens Park (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:31, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Owens Park
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not much encyclopaedic information; not notable on its own - It is included in the Fallowfield Campus article. ツStacey (talk) 20:56, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  01:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:36, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't really see any change in notability since the 2007 AfD. For that reason I would still make similar comments, that the tower is notable as a local landmark, and that the groups that have formed there (The Chemical Brothers, Van der Graaf Generator) make it worth keeping. The article still needs improvement, however. --David Edgar (talk) 02:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid the groups that formed there might be completely false - I find no evidence of them anywhere (though some lazy newspapers have since copied it from the article) ツStacey (talk) 10:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, sst ✈(conjugate) 01:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are lots of list-articles and individual articles about university buildings.  Here there are 5 residence hall articles and many more buildings' articles in Category:Buildings at the University of Manchester.  One could argue they ought to be combined into one or two list-articles, with redirects from each current title.  Certainly the Owens Park one should redirect to a list-article, rather than be deleted outright.  I don't want to create the list-article, do you?  It simply takes more work than it is worth to try to reduce here. -- do  ncr  am  00:12, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I think the 'list' style you might be referring to is the Fallowfield Campus article which includes all the buildings within the campus. In that article it only includes the sourced and useful information.. This Owens Park article unfortunately includes a lot of fluff, possible incorrect information and is largely un-sourced.ツStacey (talk) 10:03, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect perhaps where it is mentioned at the University of Manchester article as this is questionably independently notable. SwisterTwister   talk  23:04, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.