Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owl City concert tours (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C ) 00:28, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Owl City concert tours
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NCONCERT, tours need to receive extensive coverage from 3rd party reliable sources. A long indiscriminate list of concert tour dates is not necessary or notable. Its not even navigationally accessible. &mdash;  Lil_ ℧ niquℇ № 1  [talk]  17:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. These tours have recieved significant coverage in reliable sources. There were several sources noted in the first AfD and a quick Google search found these: Variety, Cave, The Pitch, The Guardian, LA Times, The Columbus Disptach, Chicago Tribune, Dallas News. I would imagine most if not all of these shows were reviewed in reliable sources. The article should be improved beyond a simple list using the available sources. --Michig (talk) 17:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - the nominator removed a large section of the article including the reflist & half the references see here whilst given a misleading edit summary. I have since reverted. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 18:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:SAL; a navigational index of notable topics. The article is too large to fit into the main article, and a link is posted there. It does not matter how useful or visible it is, it is if it is warranted rather. Another difference is this article places the items in list-form, which is handy, but not absolute. As noted before, the main article contains far less, detailed information on the subject. The notability is proven from the above reliable sources, in addition. TBrandley (what's up) 18:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep It satisfies policy as a navigational index. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:54, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.