Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owls in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 07:28, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Owls in popular culture

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

List of items which have no connection to each other - a list of loosely associated topics. Punkmorten 11:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I see no point in this article as it currently serves no purpose. If it were to be reordered and cleaned up so that it was of some use to the reader, maybe it could be kept. Mr pand 11:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Owls in pop. cult.? This is just ridiculous. Anything on this page could easily be put onto Owl but I question why I should in the first place. Owls are creatures that have been around a long time. Of course they'll be in popular culture. └ Jared ┘┌ t ┐&ensp; 13:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No, I don't think an encyclopedia needs a list of every single time an owl has appeared or been mentioned in any book, TV show, movie, video game, or play. I am hard-pressed to think of anyone who could possibly need such a list. Propaniac 13:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This one is truly redundant.  Our article on owl already contains most of the material I'd want on cultural references to owls: Athena's owl, Blodeuwedd, and others.  A number of entries from this page, like Woodsy Owl, might well be added to the article in chief, but since the article itself has a well groomed section on cultural references to owls, there is no need for this fork. - Smerdis of Tlön 13:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete pure Trivia Corpx 14:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * O RLY? Delete before they deafen us with their hooting! Lugnuts 18:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Malcolmxl5 21:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and as listcruft. Bearian 12:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete WHO gives a HOOT?
 * Delete Not all the articles in the zoo need to be deleted-- the one about "Turtles and tortoises" was actually quite good-- but this is little more than a list of occurences of the stereotypical "wise old owl" that is seen in cartoons whenever central casting is calling for "wise" Mandsford 02:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.