Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OwnCloud


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ubiquity (talk) 13:17, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

OwnCloud

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not a software product directory. ubiquity (talk) 20:36, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator: Since having been improved, I can see no objection to this article. ubiquity (talk) 13:15, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. ubiquity (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - There are now plenty of references to extensive coverage in reliable sources. &mdash; Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 21:27, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - The additional references Rwxrwxrwx has added means the article now passes the "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" standard of WP:GNG. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 12:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notability, because searching google with "OwnCloud" shows 2,080,000 results. • Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 14:51, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep yeah, an article about the subject in the Wall Street Journal in addition to the subject-area press makes it meet GNG in my mind. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Here are a few references:, , , , Google Books, Google Scholar, , HighBeam, . Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   11:36, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG. Plenty of sources. ~ EDDY  ( talk / contribs )~ 13:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.