Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OwnerIQ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:13, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

OwnerIQ

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Company without any claim to notability other than a general and unreferenced "collects ownership signals from millions of consumers". The references provided are trivial mentions. There is also a possible conflict of interest issue, since the creator's name coincides with that of the online marketing manager of the company. bonadea contributions talk 13:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Both references have the company as their primary subject and appear to be from reliable sources; I'm not quite sure how that's a "trivial" mention.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  13:10, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, strongly. This is yet another business to business, Internet related, advertising or publicity business, and that ought to be enough to qualify for speedy deletion in itself: a company that provides behavioral retargeting and behavioral targeting based on ownership cues to medium to large businesses worldwide.  The two "references" provided are to a trade-related blog interviewing the CEO (i.e. no third party information) or a press release routinely announcing funding, and do not establish that this business has any sort of historical, technical, or cultural significance. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: More references added-Miami Herald and Lead411 Boston's Hottest Company Award Article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfrothingham (talk • contribs) 17:54, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 07:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * keep DigiDayDaily and CEPro Online appear to be RSes that cover the topic in detail enough (and yes, interviews are fine). The  Miami Herald blogy thing and The Alarm Clock provide material that is more than in-passing, but not a lot.  Both appear to be RSes. The other sources aren't worthless, but aren't really worth mentioning. Meets WP:N, there is enough to write about.  Still boarder-line though.Hobit (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.