Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ox (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Ox_(album)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

notability failure Ubot16 (talk) 12:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong keep – Album meets criteria at WP:NALBUMS and WP:GNG. The album ranked on several "best of" lists, some of which were collected here. Fezmar9 (talk) 14:47, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. As well as the reviews in the article, there are more here, here, here, here and a little more here. I'm normally wary of albums that only get in the Heatseekers chart, but this one seems to meet the general notability guideline by sheer dint of coverage. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 18:46, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 18:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 18:50, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable via the coverage linked in the article.--Michig (talk) 05:47, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per all comments above. Spatulli (talk) 13:28, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.