Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxana Jad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:59, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Oxana Jad

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article written like self-promo without having any evidence behind it. NovaSkola (talk) 22:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 1.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 22:47, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete, I couldn't find any independent coverage in English, but it might exist in Russian. Happy to change my stance if such coverage can be found by someone who reads Russian.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 05:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC).
 * I tried to search in Russian and this is hopeless, since "Jad = яд" means "poison" in Russian. One finds really strange things, but nothing about her. I second weak delete.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.