Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Biodynamics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Oxford Biodynamics

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable per WP:GNG or WP:CORP as there are no independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in significant depth. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 05:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 06:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lakun.patra (talk) 06:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete no actual evidence of notability. Just press releases. DGG ( talk ) 03:24, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 13:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent media attention of the type needed to pass WP:ORG. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:29, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.