Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford International Relations Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Oxford International Relations Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The only notable event seems to be the visit of the Thai PM and none of the sources reference this society. Other sources are not independent suggesting non notability Aloneinthewild (talk) 13:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The presence of famous people doesn't confer notability and the society itself hasn't attracted much (if any) coverage as far as I can tell, so it fails WP:CLUB. All the independent coverage I can find is trivial per WP:SIGCOV (i.e. of the form Famous Person X said Y at the Oxford International Relations Society). — Nizolan  (talk) 15:03, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. — Nizolan  (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Nizolan  (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. — Nizolan  (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Nizolan  (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep mostly notable for a single controversy, it is still notable (see sources in the article). Hobit (talk) 09:06, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yet none of the sources reference this society, they reference the college or the Thai Society. Aloneinthewild (talk) 17:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Agreed with . Could you be more specific on which sources? If this is in reference to the Thai controversy, as far as I can tell none of the articles even mentions the International Relations Society. — Nizolan  (talk) 14:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:CLUB quite signally. Bishonen &#124; talk 19:10, 7 April 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete as still questionable for solid independent notability and, at best, can be mentioned at the University's article. SwisterTwister   talk  22:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.