Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford Round Table (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Article is well-sourced and well-written. The nominator's reasons for nominating are baseless. Ioeth (talk contribs friendly) 16:10, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Round Table
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The defaming of this organization has gone on long enough. The article hardly addresses the scope, purpose and attendees of the round table and editors have not been attempting to shape up this page. The posters of this page also use a blog/forum as one of the outside links that further defame this organization. This page only exists to disparage subject. DefameStop (talk) 03:32, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * strong keep An AFD from an SPA? That deserves a knee jerk keep if nothing else does. The article is a constant battleground mind you; but the criticisms it offers are well cited. --Blowdart | talk 07:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * keep, obviously (and perhaps speedily?). It isn't even that much of a battleground anymore.  And of course the nominator is not any old SPA but an obvious sockpuppet of our old friend. I do wish we would finally get an explanation of what the "defamation" consists of (though perhaps we could do without the legal threats). Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * keep Absolutely no reason to delete (or nominate) this article for deletion, and agree that the name of the user who restarted this unnecessary process (with their very first edit!) is inappropriate. Zeng8r (talk) 15:59, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.