Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oxford University Light Entertainment Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 03:30, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Oxford University Light Entertainment Society


Non notable student society per WP:ORG. Weak assertion of notability (reference to its long but interrupted history.) It is essentially an entirely new club which started in 1997 Delete Ohconfucius 03:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - 55 non-wiki ghits, quite a lot of which are from Oxford websites. Nothing else of interest found, leading to verifiability problems. MER-C 03:28, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN with WP:V problems. Not even worth merging into Oxford site.SkierRMH 09:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Cambridge Footlights is notable but this is not in the same league. Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 09:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Note that one the same grounds you would need to delete the Cambridge University Light Entertainment Society page too. I should like to rebute the claim that it is a new society as of 1997. We do have contact with older members and the society history is recorded in the Bodleian Library societiy collection. There was only an interuption of two or three years. So, I do feel that this would be a shame but if it is in line with wikipedia deletion policy then so be it.
 * The light blue equivalent is not entirely the same: that article demonstrates its notability by referring to highly notable members. Were there any prominent people in OULES? Fys. &#147;Ta fys aym&#148;. 22:57, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Please hold for a day or so to let us consult other members who have checked the archives.
 * Delete. Nothing like as significant as Footlights or OUDS. WMMartin 18:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.