Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OxyVita (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  01:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

OxyVita
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Blatant advertising. Appears to be a recreation of earlier deleted page "with adequate citation and references". As a lack of citations was irrelevant to the previous debates, it does not enhance the case for retention. No suitable previous version exists to roll back to, and no useful content is salvageable from the current article. Templates were added noting the article's shortcomings were added several months ago without significant change happening. Rogerb67 (talk) 14:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   —Rogerb67 (talk) 14:37, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge a pruned version to Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers. I agree this version is very promotional and overly specific, but not that it's totally unsalvageable. Espresso Addict (talk) 15:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge, agree with Espresso Addict. With a clinker name like OxyVita, which sounds like it belongs on the shelf next to Hadacol and Enzyte, I thought this would be worse than it is.  It remains the fact that this is a puff piece on a niche, non-consumer medical product that's still in testing. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge into Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers - though that article's in a bit of a state too. Dancarney (talk) 09:07, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.