Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oz (Judge Dredd story)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Judge Dredd. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Oz (Judge Dredd story)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced article about a comic book plotline. The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar, and the super short name of this story doesn't help here. Unless someone can find something I missed, delete or redirect to Judge_Dredd? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:20, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Topic lacks standalone coverage to meet WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 17:08, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect/Merge with an applicable article should one exist - Like, I am having a hard time finding coverage in a source check.  Dark knight  2149  21:33, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as not independently notable for a stand-alone article as per WP:GNG. Cannot find appropriate sources. A merge is a decent idea if a suitable target can be found. Jontesta (talk) 15:31, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Judge_Dredd per WP:ATD-R as a good alternative recommended in the nomination. The story is already covered there. If more content is desired to merge, it can be done from the history provided this is not deleted first.  It too was reviewed by Douglas Wolk (a subject matter expert) here, so I can be persuaded to keep if there is another review found. -2pou (talk) 23:27, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
 * A blog review usually does not meet WP:RS. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keyword: usually. That is why I made the point that he is a subject matter expert in the field linking to his article; however, I did not explicitly state here that he has published two books in my previous post. The blog post could be used as a RS per WP:SELFPUB meeting whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications. I do agree, however, that it is not enough on its own, hence the redirect !vote. -2pou (talk) 11:16, 20 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.