Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozark Adventist Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   23:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Ozark Adventist Academy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

there are no citations backing up the content on this article except for the first sentence therefore you cannot back up the claims also an article on Ozark adventist academy violates WP:ORG there is no evidence that the school itself is notable there is not much coverage of the school in newspapers TV or otherwise Jonnymoon96 (talk) 02:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - Schools do not have to meet ORG. This school is in the NCES database and at least some coverage in local media can be assumed, satisfying GNG. John from Idegon (talk) 16:40, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

citing the NCES database which i have checked here and here however being in a database does not establish notability as this school also having an article on Ozark adventist academy also assuming coverage is not good enough the supposed coverage must be citied also schools do in fact have to meet WP:ORG--Jonnymoon96 (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You are incorrect. SeeWP:NSCHOOL, which is a subset of ORG. Also, sources do not have to be cited in the article to satisfy WP:N, they simply have to exist. See WP:BEFORE, D3. John from Idegon (talk) 00:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * but in any case, here are two articles that mention the school from two different sources.
 * Keep as has reliable sources coverage as demonstrated above . The recent RFC on School Outcomes was very divided and poorly advertised ( have only just found it) so WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES should not be thrown out IMO.Atlantic306 (talk) 05:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.