Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozioma Akagha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be moved to draft via WP:REFUND if somebody wants to work on it.  Sandstein  06:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Ozioma Akagha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NACTOR. Insignificant coverage in reliable secondary sources. No major roles in any motion pictures. Comatmebro (talk) 05:59, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Speedy delete per WP:A7. Just regular Delete now that the article no longer meets A7. Still can't find sources that advance notability.  TheTechnician27  (Talk page)  08:38, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. in addition to her film and TV work, she has done some significant work in videogames and cartoons. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:07, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Multiple appearances in Runaways and Teen Titans Go! qualify (just) under WP:NACTOR. Bondegezou (talk) 15:57, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Procedural note The article was created by a ✅ sock who repeatedly recreates article on non-notable bit actors and shows. I've removed the links in the article that in no way meet WP:RS.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I realise Ponyo didn't suggest such, but just clarifying that obviously there's been substantive edits since Nosebagbear (talk) 18:04, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Move to draft pending addition of reliable sources demonstrating notability. bd2412  T 23:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:39, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify - unclear if sources exist, so the article should be draftified to allow the addition of RS. --MrClog (talk) 12:48, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Draftify as there is a claim to pass WP:NACTOR but reliable sources references to significant coverage are needed for mainspace, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:16, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an IMDb mirror. IMDb is a non-reliable source that seeks to cover everyone with no regard to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:54, 2 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.