Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ozone Peak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request undeletion of these articles. Liz Read! Talk! 23:40, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Ozone Peak

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No sources of notability in article or available on the web. It mostly lists facts from a table in a catalog. See WP:NOTCATALOG Gumgl (talk) 20:02, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

I am nominating a bundle of 107 articles for deletion. These were all created by one user in late 2016 with the same format. The only source in all the articles beyond the subjects' manufacturer's listing page is World Directory of Leisure Aviation 2003-04. This seems to clearly go against the WP:DIRECTORY policy. I fly paragliders and the lifespan of a model is at most 10 years after its production/release although this upper bound is very rare. The vast majority cease to be used after ~6 years for safety concerns (aging of the fabric). Therefore at the time of creation, all the data was about models at least 13 years in the past, and thus obsolete and long forgotten. None of the models listed below have any notoriety nor any relevance today in an industry/sport with dozens of brands each releasing multiple models every year. Recent models might actually have a web presence with reviews and news articles on the Internet, but none of the models below do as they largely predate the popularization of the Internet.



Relisting comment: Why hasn't the author been notified? Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen&times; &#9742;  22:25, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Walsh90210 (talk) 21:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I spot-checked two (Trekking Carver, Windtech Coral) which had nothing close to notability in a search, though I did find a list of Trekking aircraft. I'm loathe to !vote delete on all of these, though, without reviewing them, which is the problem with these bulk nominations. SportingFlyer  T · C  22:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I just added 6 more from Gradient. Note that this list is not exhaustive, there would be about as many articles of paramotors and another equal amount about hang gliders that are in the same situation but since I am more familiar with paragliders I decided to start there. Gumgl (talk) 23:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Sorry this is my first time following the WP:AFDHOWTO process and I somehow glanced over that step. Looks like you took care of it, thanks. Gumgl (talk) 18:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete all. I spot-checked one article for each brand and the nom's representation is accurate. It would be a huge waste of time to de-bundle these. Suggest the nom use WP:PROD next time if possible. -- asilvering (talk) 18:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.